Howards End Essays

Howards End Essays Howards End Essay Howards End Essay Essay Topic: Woman of Colour Novel How does Forster use contrast and opposition in the aftermath of Mrs Wilcoxs death? Throughout the novel, Howards End, Forster has used contrast as one of the main structural devices to develop the connection between the relationships. Materialism and spiritualism are one of the contrasts in the novel which aid us when viewing the relationships between the Wilcox family. Spiritualism is the unseen, the intangible attachment to objects in life and Mrs Wilcox represents the unseen in the novel even after she has died. Forster is presenting the unseen to us through the colour of nature/images of Mrs Wilcoxs funeral and though Mrs Wilcox isnt physically present her spirit still lives on in nature. For example Clouds drifted over it from the west; or the church may have been a ship, high prowed, steering with all its company towards infinity Forsters use of the sea and imagery in this line helps present the unseen and how spiritually Mrs Wilcox will live for an infinite amount of years and that death is just part of the circle of life; that we live this world for another part of life- that there is no beginning or end to life. Contrasting Mrs Wilcox the rest of the Wilcox family represent the seen tangible objects in life like the business world and motorcars their world is filled with panic and emptiness. The language Forster has used to discuss the funeral seems deliberate as the poor were the only people that remained which is a credit to the memory of Mrs Wilcox as they have something in common, a connection to nature, but its disgrace to the rest of the family for the Wilcox family as they are of a high social class and to even be associated with those abyss was degrading. I somehow feel though that E.M Forster cannot write in great description of those who are poor as he said that every situation he had written about he had no personal experience of the home life of Leonard and Jacky in Howards End. In Forsters opinion Mr Bast is stereotype of a poor person. Continuing on the Forster does not mention Mrs Wilcoxs name she is referred to as the dead woman a cold description emphasising the cold hearts of the Wilcoxes and stressing the importance of keeping the spirit of Mrs Wilcox present throughout the novel, in this case, representing her mysterious nature that her family could n ot relate to. Even more so, the references to the lower classes emphasise the callus mind of the rest of the Wilcox family and how later on they handling of the letter proves this as they do not deal with feelings they are pragmatic for example the sarcastic comment about how funeral of the rich was to them what the funeral of Alecestis or Ophelia is to the educated Supporting the evidence so far it is clear that Mrs Wilcox knew no more of worldly wickedness than did the flowers in her garden contrasting the rest of her family quite immensely, which is also proof that her family did not understand her beliefs- this is evident when they turn the pony stable into a garage for though there may not have been a pony in the stables the stable had sentimental value to Mrs Wilcox as this was her family home losing the traditional rural look and becoming more urbanised. Mrs Wilcox was a woman who transcended others and is described as trailing noiselessly, and the rest of the Wilcox family hadnt noticed that Mrs Wilcox was infact a mysterious woman and though they felt she had gone, and, as if to make her going the more bitter, had with a touch of mystery that was unlike her shows that there was a lack of personal relationship between the Wilcoxes. Through opposition, Forster has shown the lack of emotion and how the Wilcoxes ignore their emotions. The imagery that has been used helps present the lack of connection to the Wilcoxes feelings and how they block them out through fortresses and hiding their emotions explains their materialism without it their would be panic and emptiness. When discussing the matter of the letter Mrs Wilcoxs name is never mentioned she is referred to as an invalid which again shows the lack of connection to their mother and wife as they are impersonal and this should be a time of grief not for discussing the letter, especially in a business like manner which we can tell when the two men were assuming the manner of the committee-room. The unseen had impacted on the seen, and all that they could say was Treachery. This shows that the formal men of the Wilcox family have a higher superiority of the women in their lives and their values cannot be tested, everything has to be logical and for things they do not truly understand, that are intangible like the sentimental values that Margaret and Mrs Wilcox shared there is perhaps in Charles eyes an alternate motive to Margarets intentions were unduly to manipulate Mrs Wilcox. At the end of the chapter there is a metaphor that refer to the Wilcoxs avoiding their emotion and stop them from hearing reality voyaged past the sirens, having first stopped one anothers ears with wool both the Wilcox men are blocking out the emotion of how hurt they are by losing Ruth Wilcox but they are also blocking out the guilt from ignoring her last wishes of leaving Howards End to Margaret. Howards End was not just a house but to Mrs Wilcox it was her spirit. However more to the point I have perceived Forsters attitudes to the seen and unseen throughout chapter 11 and the rest of the novel to suggest that one cannot be without the other and that to make the world what it is they both are viewed by many people differently but are connected because it makes us all the individuals that we are.

The City of Ember Essays

The City of Ember Essays The City of Ember Paper The City of Ember Paper Lina- main character of the story, portrays significance in her role as one of the main personality in discovering the mystery of the â€Å"City of Ember†, and lead the story in an act of escape from the underworld with her friend doon. Doon-plays another major character in the story, whereas, he and his friendship as messenger with the people of the city of ember, lead to discovering clues in which he himself was surprised to discover the mystery behind the 200 plus years old underground city. Other Characters th Mayor- significantly acted to be guilty in leading the story into its plot scenic as chaotic, near destruction scenario; connived with Looper in saving food and supplies for themselves; Characterized as to linked with the box of clues transferred from one generation to another and depicted to have open it to discover the message on how to escape from underground. Ms. Murdo- live with Lina and her sister, her character is linked to the story as the one who received the message of LIna on how to get up from the underground. Plot Summary The Builders of Ember, fearing an apocalyptic event, built the city to ensure that humans would continue to exist. Later we discover that the Builders planned that future generations would grow up with no knowledge of a world outside, so that they (would) feel no sorrow for what they have lost. The city was designed to last no longer than 220 years, at the conclusion of which the citizens of Ember were to receive instructions contained in a time-locked box held by the mayor that described how to leave the city. However, over the course of 241 years, the box has popped open and been mislaid. The people of Ember have no knowledge of what lies beyond their electric flood lamps. Most believe that Ember is the only light in a dark world. Many fear that despite their relentless recycling efforts the city of Ember is slowly dying. When the antiquated generator begins to plunge the entire city unexpectedly into blackouts, two young people begin to search for answers to the blackouts, the food shortages, and the lessoning of the town’s seemingly inexhaustible consumer supplies. Lina obtains a job as messenger and travels the town, learning the true nature of the city’s shortages and of the people’s fears. In the course of her job Lina also discovers that some powerful people are taking advantage of their positions and hoarding supplies for themselves. Doon obtains a job working as a pipeworks laborer and learns that the generator is in a decrepit condition. When Lina discovers the damaged fragments of the Builder’s document that contains instructions for leaving Ember, she and Doon decide to work together to decipher the message. Before they can share their discovery with everyone, the corrupt Mayor tries to withhold the information and destroy their hard work. Lina and Doon escape from the Mayor and the city of Ember in a small boat following the Builder’s deciphered instructions. They arrive above ground where they witness their first sunrise. In their hurry to escape, however, they neglected to pass on the exit instructions to their friends in Ember. Finding a crevasse, they crawl through and drop the instruction wrapped in Doon’s jacket to the city far below. Personal Impressions and Conclusion The story of the â€Å" City of Ember† is a mystery considerably fictional to my knowledge, living for 200 years far below underground, in which portrays some known stories written and directed even through movies. However, the story offers a little more exciting as in the plot has strategic sequencing and transition from one phase of the story to another, for that it is commendable. The characters have translated its importance as to their roles in the story. It is also good to note the simplicity of the story in depicting the characters and events in the language simple yet consistent. Meanwhile, the ending of the story seems to fail and sustain the suspense of the story. It just ended purposely leading readers thought it in series, but generally, the story is good and still commendable to be recommended for further readings.

Philopsphy paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Philopsphy paper - Essay Example The concept of categorical imperative is deservingly considered to be the dominant in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. It states that a person should do something not because he wants to do this, but following the rule that is common for everybody and should be strictly followed. â€Å"All imperatives are expressed with an ‘ought’, which indicates how an objective law of reason relates to a will that isn’t constituted so as to be necessarily determined by it—namely, relating to it as a constraint. An imperative says that it would be good to do or to refrain from doing something, but it addresses this to a will that doesn’t always do x just because x is represented to it as good to do†(Kant 18) Kant states that if a person allows himself/herself to set the principle that will be followed only by him/her and not by the rest of the people, this person can be called immoral. Kant provides different examples to demonstrate how categorical imperativ e was derived. The most widespread example is a person’s request for money that he/she is not going to give back, notwithstanding that the promise is given by him/her. Kant states that if all the people break promises, they [promises] would not exist any more as people would stop believing them. Thus, promises should not be broken and there is a common law not to break the promises as this is not right. Here we meet the first reason why right is right and wrong is wrong. The actions fulfilled in accordance with the universal principles set in the society, which should be strictly followed by the people, are considered to be â€Å"right† and everything that contradicts this principle is â€Å"wrong†. Our actions should not be based on our desires, they should be implemented in accordance with the universal rule. The main thing is not to cause any harm to other people. Thus, if an action brings harm to people, as in our example, it can’t become a universal law and should not be followed. â€Å"Obviously the false promise isn’t made prudent by its merely extricating me from my present dif?culties; I have to think about whether it will in the long run cause more trouble than it saves in the present People’s loss of trust in me might be far more disadvantageous than the trouble I am now trying to avoid, and it is hard to tell whether it mightn’t be more prudent to act according to a universal maxim not ever to make a promise that I don’t intend to keep† (Kant 11). The conclusion can be made from the example that promises should not be broken as this causes harm to people. Any break of promise can be considered to be immoral. According to Kant, there is a universal law and it is immoral to break it. 2. According to Singer, we must not act so as to sacrifice a major interest for a minor interest. Explain why. Explain how this affects Singer’s views on the eating animals and use of them in experimen ts and his views on abortion and euthanasia. The philosophy of Peter Singler is very interesting and unique. According to Peter Singer, we should not sacrifice major interest to satisfy minor interest. Minor interest is the interest that may be ignored and we can easily do without its satisfaction. Major interest is more serious as if it is not satisfied it may cause a trouble. Single apply this statement to the issue of eating animals. He is against consuming the flesh of animals as considers the